Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stevens v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Michelle Stevens
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Department of Child Safety, Robert Floring and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jordan Mendez v. Jordan Peter Barnes et al
as 8:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jordan Peter Mendez
Defendant:
Sheriff Coroner Don Barnes, Robert Flores and Lieutenant Manhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun et al v. Bank of America NA
as 2:2021cv01613
Plaintiff:
Armand Calhoun and Robert Flores
Defendant:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01991
Plaintiff:
Robert Flores
Defendant:
Jonathan Sorola and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Unknown:
Brenda H Entzminger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gomez v. Sanders
as 1:2016cv00662
Petitioner:
Robert Flores Gomez
Respondent:
Linda M Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilbert Lerma, Jr. v. Ernie Armijo et al
as 2:2015cv09953
Defendant:
Ernie Armijo, Joe Armijo, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Lerma, Jr
Flores v. Alameda County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2015cv03515
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robert Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System et al
as 3:2012cv04786
Plaintiff:
Robert Flores and Liduvina Flores
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Aurora Bank, FSB, Aurora Loan Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Freddie Flores v. USA
as 11-72341
Petitioner:
FREDDIE ROBERT FLORES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brian Adams et al v. Michaels Stores, Inc
as 2:2009cv01939
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lawley, Lorraine Morales, Christina Bartley and others
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
