Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. NAPH Care et al
as 2:2017cv02345
Defendant:
Clark County Det Center, Robert Freeman, Law Firm of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Freeman v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50680
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09033
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Freeman v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2015cv00305
Petitioner:
James Robert Freeman
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00789
Petitioner:
James Robert Freeman
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sunkin v. Cloke et al
as 5:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Sunkin
Defendant:
Alec T. Cloke, Craig A. Hall, Nicholas Kamenszky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03311
Plaintiff:
Dana L. Freeman and Robert Freeman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Win Neuger et al v. Robert Freeman et al
as 2:2013cv09332
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Feinstein, Marshall Manley, Marshall Manley and others
Defendant:
Robert Freeman, Tory Freeman and Freeman & Sear
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
