Cases 1 - 10 of 35
GOULD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-04640
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOULD
GOULD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04640
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOULD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00289
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, ROBERT GOULD, BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Defendant:
TIMOTHY NOLES, TOMMY DICKS, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
UTRIA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
RICHARD UTRIA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COURTNEY L. BRANCH, ROBERT GOULD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Utria v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Richard Utria
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Courtney L. Branch, Robert Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULCIN v. CHUNN et al
as 4:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
J CHUNN, V HUGGINS, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John R Wade et al vs. Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust et al
as 1:2020cv10523
Defendant:
Tri -Wire Employee Stock Option Trust, ROBERT LANDRY, ROBERT R. NEWELL and others
Plaintiff:
John R Wade, Taylor Wade, Sharon Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Goulding v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2019cv00957
Defendant:
Jeffery Hopkins, Intrepid Wendover Nugget, Wendover Nugget Operator and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Robert Goulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
