Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HAIRSTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96177
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00349
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mickens et al v. Clear et al
as 7:2019cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson, Joe Honaker, Bobby Vandyke and others
Defendant:
McCoy, Billord, Steven Clear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp.
as 12-3336
Plaintiff:
Raymond Allen, Llanos Blas, Nabil Elfiky and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bobby Irizarry, Ruben Mora, Joselito Arocho and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Carlos Torres, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Lewis Chewning
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Gristede's Operating Corp., Namdor, Inc., Gristede's Foods, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gallo Balseca, John Catsimatidis and James Monos
Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp. et
as 11-4035
Plaintiff:
Raymond Allen, Llanos Blas, Nabil Elfiky and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bobby Irizarry, Ruben Mora, Joselito Arocho and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Carlos Torres, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Lewis Chewning
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Gristede's Foods NY, Inc., Gristede's Operating Corp., Namdor, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Gallo Balseca and James Monos
Defendant - Appellant:
John Catsimatides
Gamblin, et al v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Gwen Gamblin and Robert Hairston, Sr
Defendant:
City of Akron, John Doe, #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIRSTON v. HEFFRON
as 1:2009cv05971
Petitioner:
ROBERT HAIRSTON
Respondent:
M.P. HEFFRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
