Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Harden v. Tecumseh State Correctional Institute et al
as 8:2020cv00281
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Tecumseh State Correctional Institute and Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden et al v. Hedgecock et al
as 6:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden, Misty Harden and Savanaha Works
Defendant:
Timothy Byers, B.J. Hedgecock and Tamara Rashae Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00492
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Doug Peterson, State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and others
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Harden v. State of Nebraska
as 19-3049
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Harden v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2017cv03095
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Robert Clayton Hicks, Matt Kuhse, Aimee Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Harden v. KY, et al
as 17-5637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HARDEN, Biological Father of C.H.H. and H.M.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, CABINET FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, LEE AUSTIN, Social Worker, in Official Capacity and others
Harden v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Lee Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noell et al v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2015cv02404
Plaintiff:
Emily Noell and Robert Harden
Defendant:
Clayton County, Gregory Porter, Marc Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden et al v. Popper et al
as 1:2015cv03448
Plaintiff:
Lucy Holland Harden and Robert Harden
Defendant:
Brian Popper, Mitchell Mekles and 2110-2118 ACPB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harden v. Stoker et al
as 3:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Amber Rene Stoker, State of Kentucky, Sara Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
