Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Harper v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02949
Petitioner:
Christopher Robert Harper
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harper v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv03281
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harper v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Robert Harper
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HARPER, JR. v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv04625
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARPER, JR.
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harper v. Comenity Bank
as 3:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Robert Harper v. Amazon.com Services Inc
as 23-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC and AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC, NKA Amazon.com Services LLC
USA v. Christopher Harper
as 22-5984
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HARPER
Fischer et al v. Instant Checkmate LLC.
as 1:2019cv04892
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lukis, Robert Fischer and Robert Harper
Defendant:
Instant Checkmate LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harper v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv04922
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Harper v. Amazon.com Services Inc, et al
as 20-2614
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant / Appellant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
