Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Falls v. Jerome et al
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Sherald Dante Falls
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Dr Robert Jerome, A Panos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Jerome
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sean T Benson
Defendant:
Dr Robert Jerome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marquez v. Jerome
as 2:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Orlando Marquez
Defendant:
Dr Robert Jerome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19671
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JEROME TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BECK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16363
Plaintiff:
ANJALETTA BECK, ARNALDO SANTIAGO, ROBERT JEROME TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wright v. Lotti et al
as 1:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wright
Defendant:
Vincent A. Lotti, Darius Pattilo, Sabriya H. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robert Byers v. Matthew Vester, et al
as 22-35676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JEROME BYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW VESTER, LEZLEE CURTIS, Two Rivers Food Service Coordinators and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
