Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Davis v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff: Robert P Davis
Defendant: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Clayton v. Hunt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv00063
Plaintiff: Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant: FNU Hunt, FNU Derbez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00070
Plaintiff: Earnest Barnard Clayton
Defendant: Stanley Williams, Kristy Parker, Calvin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, et al v. US
as 11-2256
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party: DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff: OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Litif, et al v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2255
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANNA M. LITIF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF, LEE LITIF and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Interested Party: PETER GELZINIS, SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Davis, et al v. US, et al
as 10-2369
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
Interested Party: MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS
DAVIS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74111
Plaintiff: ROBERT P. DAVIS
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant: JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Litif, et al v. United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1472
Plaintiff: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANNA M. LITIFF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF and LEE LITIF
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES
: , and
Davis, et al v. US, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Plaintiff: OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
: and
Davis, et al v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1419
Plaintiff: OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
: and

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?