Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Johnson v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Johnson and Dorothy Dale-Chambers
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, City of Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pitts et al v. Maxwell et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pitts and Robert Pitts
Defendant:
Richard Gale Maxwell and Clays Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
John Aguirre et al v. City of Brea
as 8:2022cv02236
Plaintiff:
John Aguirre, Neil Baltes, Brent Basaites and others
Defendant:
City of Brea
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kenta Settles v. City of Garfield Heights, OH, et al
as 21-4040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GARFIELD HEIGHTS, OH, MICHAEL MALAK, Patrolman and ROBERT PITTS, Patrolman
Kenta Settles v. Michael Malak, et al
as 21-4038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATROLMAN MICHAEL MALAK, PATROLMAN ROBERT PITTS, PATROLMAN BRIAN REGOVICH and others
Kenta Settles v. Michael Malak, et al
as 21-4017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENTA SETTLES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATROLMAN MICHAEL MALAK, PATROLMAN ROBERT PITTS, PATROLMAN BRIAN REGOVICH and others
James Pitts v. Mark Grant, et al
as 21-12759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK A. GRANT, LEON GATES and KEVIN HOLDER
Settles v. City of Garfield Heights et al
as 1:2020cv01631
Defendant:
Robert Pitts, City of Garfield Heights and Michael Malak
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Grant et al
as 1:2020cv03021
Plaintiff:
James Robert Pitts
Defendant:
Mark A. Grant, Leon Gates and Kevin Holder
Settles v. Malak et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Defendant:
Patrolman Brian Regovich, City of Garfield Heights, Sergeant William Gall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
