Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Morris v. USA
as 2:2023cv00690
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WASHINGTON v. SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv23179
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al.
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robert Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency Administration and APA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
WASHINGTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv16631
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT SMITH WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ELLEN E. LOUGHNEY, ERIC R. SHENKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. SMALL et al
as 3:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
CODY JAMES SMALL and COMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. DWIGHT et al
as 3:2023cv03469
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
RYAN DAY DWIGHT, OFFICER DOVE, ANGELA GORDUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. ARAMARK
as 3:2022cv22212
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
ARA MARK and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wooten et al
as 6:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
Tyler Robert Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Wooten, Nicole Bambeski and Diana S. Miers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. Pennell et al
as 8:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Emery
Defendant:
Russell Pennell, Alexander Lake and Officer Hand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
