Cases 41 - 50 of 611
Scott Jr. et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20688
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Jr. and Jane Scott Jr.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PS) Peden, et al., v. Bernard et al
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elvis Peden and Bruno Berry
Defendant:
George Bernard, Peter Bernard, Teresa Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. SMALL et al
as 3:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
CODY JAMES SMALL and COMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. DWIGHT et al
as 3:2023cv03469
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
RYAN DAY DWIGHT, OFFICER DOVE, ANGELA GORDUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dessie Andrews
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Current and Former Members of Congress, Robert B Aderholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ubiera v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Altagracia Delrosario Ubiera
Defendant:
Wydette Williams, Johnny Hedgemon, Deshaun Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Metacrine, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09939
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Metacrine, Inc., Richard Heyman, Ronald Evans and others
SCOTT v. ARAMARK
as 3:2022cv22212
Plaintiff:
TYLER ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
ARA MARK and ARAMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Donley's, Incorporated
as 1:2022cv01906
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Harris
Defendant:
Donley's, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. VMware, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
VMware, Inc., Nicole Anasenes, Anthony Bates and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
