Cases
United Food and Commerical Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan et al v. Topaz Retail, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00735
Plaintiff: United Food and Commerical Workers Union Local 655 Food Employers Joint Pension Plan, David Cook, Robert Spence and others
Defendant: Topaz Retail, LLC d/b/a IGA, Elsberry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Robert Spence, II
as 21-10112
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT SPENCE II
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SPENCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71232
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant: THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almars Outboards, Inc. v. Robert Spence
as 1:2018cv00210
Plaintiff: Almars Outboards, Inc.
Defendant: Robert Spence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4555
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
RENEHAN v. ALEXANDER et al
as 2:2008cv00094
Plaintiff: RODNEY ALLEN RENEHAN
Defendant: NINA ALEXANDER, ROBERT SPENCE, MICHAEL ESLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2002cv00826
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?