Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Rayford, Jr v. Montgomery County et al
as 3:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Larry Rayford, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Charles S. Bloodworth, Jaclyn M. Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03688
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Patricia Murphy
Defendant:
Robert Thomas, Newcomb Warehouse Inc. and Erie Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Fletcher v. T.N. Bureau of Investigations et al
as 3:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Darrell Fletcher
Defendant:
T.N. Bureau of Investigations, Bedford County T.N. D.A. Office and Robert Thomas Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Connor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robert Thomas O'Connor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robert Cechini v. USA
as 21-1807
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT THOMAS CECHINI
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Irvin v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Judge Charles Smith, State of Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security, Clarksville, Montgomery County Tennessee City Court and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cechini v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00003
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Robert Thomas Cechini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
