Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wilson v. United Services Automobile Association
as 2:2023cv05947
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association and USAA General Indemnity Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wilson v. PAG Austin L1 LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
PAG Austin L1 LLC and Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ACEVEDO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03212
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DINGUS, DESMOND DAVIS, DENNIS ROTHERY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acevedo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02140
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dingus, Desmond Davis, Dennis Rothery and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILSON, JR. v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv10335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON, JR.
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Wilson, Jr. v. United State
as 16-2435
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Robert Wilson, Jr. v. United States
as 15-2727
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Robert Wilson, Jr. v. United State
as 15-2709
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Wilson v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01014
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson et al v. Fountain et al
as 3:2009cv00669
Plaintiff:
William Roberts Wilson, Jr. and Roberts Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard M. Fountain, Richard M. Fountain, Law Offices of Richard M. Fountain, P. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
