Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Michael Moment v. Ahmed Rahimi
as 23-2292
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOMENT
Defendant:
AHMED RAHIMI, EVANS FOMUNYOH, CITY OF TAKOMA PARK and others
Simmons-Robison v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 8:2023cv05435
Plaintiff:
Alberta P Simmons-Robison
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robison v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01438
Plaintiff:
Lewis Robison
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robison v. USA
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Rita F. Robison
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Moment v. Rahimi et al
as 8:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Michael Moment
Defendant:
Ahmed Rahimi, Evans Fomunyoh, City/Town of Takoma Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Robison v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv04458
Plaintiff:
Alberta Simmons Robison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Butler v. Sullivan et al
as 5:2022ct03341
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
Warden Sullivan, Warden Ramos, Captain Fringley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ricky Butler v. Warden Sullivan
as 22-7000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
