Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sanders v. River Oaks Chrysler Jeep, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03744
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and River Oaks Chrysler Jeep, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rochelle Sanders v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06085
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, Grammer Industries, Inc. and Chrysler Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14776
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11728
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sanders and Willie Sanders
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rochelle Haynes, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE SANDERS HAYNES, individually & on behalf of L.M. Hanyes and C.O. McKnight and LARRY MAXWELL HAYNES, III, individually & on behalf of L.M. Hanyes and C.O. McKnight
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Earl H. Stockdale, Chief Counsel, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Loretta Lynch, DENISE FREDERICK, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Rochelle Haynes v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 15-30740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rochelle Sanders Haynes, individually & on behalf of L.M. Hanyes and C.O. McKnight and Larry Maxwell Haynes, III, individually & on behalf of L.M. Hanyes and C.O. McKnight
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Earl H. Stockdale, Chief Counsel, United States Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, Denise Frederick, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Haynes et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Sanders Haynes and Larry Maxwell Haynes, III
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Attorney General, Denise Frederick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
