Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00401
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anna Arias v. Rodney Brenneman, et al
as 22-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNA D. ARIAS
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY EARL BRENNEMAN, M.D. and LANCASTER ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES LTD
Earl v. Ace American Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Rodney Earl
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. and Robert Leach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DRUMMOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41303
Plaintiff:
RODNEY EARL DRUMMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arias v. Brenneman et al
as 2:2021cv01818
Defendant:
Lancaster Orthopedic Associataes, LTD and Rodney Earl Brenneman
Plaintiff:
Anna D Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arias v. Brenneman et al
as 5:2021cv01818
Defendant:
Lancaster Orthopedic Associataes, LTD and Rodney Earl Brenneman
Plaintiff:
Anna D Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arias v. Brenneman et al
as 2:2021cv01817
Defendant:
Lancaster Orthopedic Associataes, LTD and Rodney Earl Brenneman
Plaintiff:
Anna D Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Mangum et al
as 5:2018cv00157
Defendant:
Rodney Earl Mangum and RJ Logistics
Plaintiff:
Liliana E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
