Cases 11 - 20 of 216
Joe Rodriguez v. United States
as 23-2309
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joe Lenard Rodriguez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Curtis et al v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Curtis, Danial Ray Curtis and Oddessa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Fargo Police Department, Fargo Building Inspector and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv04032
Petitioner:
Dennys Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilbert Glover v. Matt Bostrom, et al
as 23-1104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant / Appellee:
Matt Bostrom, Dave Metusalem, Joe Paget, #9 and others
Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Joe Lenard Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodriguez v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Cahill et al
as 0:2022cv02327
Plaintiff:
Joel P. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Steven J. Cahill and Brian J. Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moellenberndt v. Nessaief et al
as 4:2022cv03178
Plaintiff:
Devin Lee Moellenberndt
Defendant:
Mohammed Nessaief, Rodriguez Emilio and Scott Frakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Dorman et al
as 4:2022cv04056
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Defendant:
Sheriff Gary Dorman, Manuel Rodriguez, Deputy Michael Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Rodriguez et al
as 6:2022cv06064
Plaintiff:
Jay Daniel Sanders
Defendant:
Deputy US Marshal Issac Rodriguez, Investigator Allen Constant, Chief Deputy Stephen Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
