Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
STEPHENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53847
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ROGER STEPHENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
Robert Vogt, Mario Jackson, Jerry Wilson and others
Defendant:
EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Express Courier International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Stephens v. Slaubaugh
as 3:2020cv03004
Plaintiff:
Roger Stephens
Defendant:
Myron Slaubaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen v. Racing Resources & Services, LLC
as 1:2010cv21661
Plaintiff:
Roger Stephen
Defendant:
Racing Resources & Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Fowler v. Hartly
as 6:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Roger Stephen Fowler
Defendant:
Tina Hartly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Walker County Human Resources et al
as 6:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
Roger Stephen Fowler
Defendant:
Walker County Human Resources and Tina Hartly
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. DOWNTOWN INDY ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01276
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., FOX-GIMBEL PRODUCTIONS, INC., CHARLES FOX and others
Defendant:
DOWNTOWN INDY ENTERPRISES, INC. and KENNETH THORPE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
