Cases 31 - 40 of 41
THOMAS v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2010cv00268
Petitioner:
ROGER THOMAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Minix et al
as 0:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pansy Kaye Minix, Roger Thomas Robinson and Norwest Financial Kentucky, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Peynado v. Sabol et al
as 1:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Martin Luther Peynado
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Bureau of Immigration and Custom Enforcement, Young and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Heffington v. Bush, et al
as 09-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAN HEFFINGTON, Individually and on behalf of Mark W. Heffington (Deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, President, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CATHERINE MITCHELL, D.O. and others
Brown v. Louie et al
as 1:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Defendant:
Dalt Louie, David Corey, Roger Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fain v. Wideman et al
as 8:2008cv04127
Plaintiff:
Roger Thomas Fain
Defendant:
Dan Wideman and Tim Griffin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Melbourne v. D.H.S. et al
as 4:2008cv02199
Plaintiff:
Wallace A. Melbourne
Defendant:
D.H.S., Joe Saleme, Donald Monica and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Melbourne v. Saleme et al
as 4:2008cv02129
Plaintiff:
Wallace Melbourne
Defendant:
Joe Saleme, Donald Monica, Steve Chronister and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rudacille v. Hoke et al
as 4:2008cv01718
Plaintiff:
Brent Ian Rudacille
Defendant:
Doug Hoke, Stanley Rebert, Richard Keuerleber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAMPBELL v. YORK COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2008cv04305
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CAMPBELL
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY PRISON, THOMAS H. HOGAN, ROGER THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
