Cases 1 - 10 of 460
Rohan et al v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Denise Rohan, Nathan Rohan, Sandra Yankow and others
Defendant:
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. and Mazda Motor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Hankerson et al v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson and Rohan Ron Hankerson
Defendant:
Bank Of America, Commissioner Bank of America, District Court of Queens, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rohan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rohan
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kaur, D.D.S. et al v. Jeorgos et al
as 1:2024cv10548
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. and Amandeep Kaur, D.D.S. P.C.
Defendant:
Elvisa Jeorgos, Tyanna Yaman, Aparna Khanna, D.M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ball v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Rohan Ball
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
BALL v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BALL
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
