Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Scott v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Roland Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00600
Petitioner:
Roland Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Crescent Marine Towing, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03181
Not Classified By Court:
Cargill Inc, Crescent Marine Towing, Inc, Joshua Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Scott, III
Defendant:
Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Marine Personal Injury
Roland Scott, Jr. v. USA
as 21-2318
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROLAND SCOTT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Roland Scott, Jr.
as 20-3223
Defendant / Appellant:
ROLAND SCOTT, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott v. USA
as 3:2020cv00472
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Roland Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv02342
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROLAND SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Roland Scott, Jr.
as 19-1124
Defendant / Appellant:
ROLAND SCOTT, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EPIC TECH, LLC v. STHR GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
EPIC TECH, LLC
Defendant:
STHR GROUP, LLC , PRYOR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. , FALCON AMUSEMENT, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
THOMAS J. LESERRE, JR. , FALCON AMUSEMENT, LLC , ROLAND SCOTT and others
Cross_defendant:
DDDDB,LLC and RICHARD SCHAPPEL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Roland Alvarez v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50045
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROLAND SCOTT ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
