Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Osborne v. Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08396
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Osborne
Defendant:
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., John P. Groetelaars, William G. Dempsey and others
Smith, James v. Malone, Ronald et al
as 3:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
James Alfred Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald K Malone and Jon E. Litscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith, James v. Malone, Ronald
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
James Alfred Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald K. Malone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Malone et al
as 2:2017cv01758
Plaintiff:
Tramaine M Moore
Defendant:
Ronald K Malone , John Doe and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Orlowski, et al v. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, et al
as 16-2166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY ORLOWSKI, Individually and ESTATE OF ALEXANDER L. ORLOWSKI, by Special Administrator Gary Orlowski
Defendant - Appellee:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, IRBY E. ALEXANDER, ANTHONY MANNS and others
Malone et al v. Bauerle Financial Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Malone and Tammy Malone
Defendant:
Bauerle Financial Inc. and Todd Alex Bauerle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orlowski et al v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2013cv01318
Plaintiff:
Gary Orlowski and Estate of Alexander L Orlowski
Defendant:
Milwaukee County , Irby E Alexander , Anthony Manns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malone v. Ball et al
as 6:2013cv00897
Plaintiff:
Ronald Aaron Malone
Defendant:
Jason Ball, James Campbell and Rusk Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. City of Dothan et al (MAG+)
as 1:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
Ronald David Malone
Defendant:
City of Dothan and Bobby Rahal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Cuzzola v. Anthony Strange, et al
as 13-11061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE CUZZOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY H. STRANGE, RONALD A. MALONE, JOHN R. POTAPCHUK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
