Cases 1 - 10 of 13
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75473
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09721
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2019cv12288
Plaintiff:
Ronald King and Mary S King
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03156
Plaintiff:
JARROD JONES, JAMES MAGLOTHIN, GARY HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02132
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Jones, James Maglothin, Gary Harris and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
King et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv04486
Plaintiff:
Rebecca King and Ronald King
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Bryant et al
as 3:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Christopher B. Epps, Phillip Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
King v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01660
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King, Jr. v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2015cv14506
Plaintiff:
Ronald King, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51145
Plaintiff:
Ronald King
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
