Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EMRIT v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Defendant:
STEPHANIE COURTNEY, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and FLO
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Progressive Insurance et al
as 8:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance and Stephanie Courtney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Emrit v. Progressive Insurance et al.
as 1:2024cv00046
Defendant:
Stephanie Courtney, Progressive Insurance and Flo
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v. Grammy Awards, The
as 3:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Grammy Awards, The doing business as The Recording Academy/NARAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Emrit v. Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
as 1:2018cv00442
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Regional Transit Center (RTC)
as 1:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Regional Transit Center (RTC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Spring Mountain Treatment Center (SMTC)
as 1:2018cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Spring Mountain Treatment Center (SMTC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Saint Rose de Lima Hospital
as 1:2018cv00436
Defendant:
Saint Rose de Lima Hospital
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
