Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Rooker v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv00161
Plaintiff: Buddy Allen Rooker
Defendant: John Doe, Monroe and Billy Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rooker v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00672
Plaintiff: Robert A. Rooker
Defendant: Joel Jenkins, Timothy Dickerson, Pike County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lehman v. Rooker et al
as 1:2016cv00578
Plaintiff: James R. Lehman, Jr.
Defendant: Dr. Rooker and RN Acree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CB et al v. St. Vincent's Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02282
Plaintiff: CB
Defendant: St. Vincent's Services, Inc. , Heart Share Human Services of New York , Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevier v. Haslam et al
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff: Chris Sevier
Defendant: William Edward (Bill) Haslam, Herbert H. Slatery, III, Megan Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noreeldeen Abdulkarim v. TN, et al
as 15-6139
Plaintiff - Appellant: NOREELDEEN ABDULKARIM
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, MONTE WATKINS, ELAINE HEARD and others
Abdulkarim v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00926
Plaintiff: Noreeldeen Abdulkarim
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Monte Watkins, Elaine Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Dixon v. TN, et al
as 15-5656
Plaintiff - Appellant: CEDRIC DIXON
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STEVE RANDOLPH DOZIER, RICHARD R. ROOKER and others
Dixon v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00547
Plaintiff: Cedric Dixon
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Steve R. Dozier, Richard R. Rooker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01042
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?