Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Torres et al v. New York University Hospital
as 1:2021cv07228
Plaintiff:
Maria Torres and Rosa Pena
Defendant:
New York University Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv16203
Plaintiff:
ROSA PENA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv15720
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ROSA PENA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv13073
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ROSA PENA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosa Pena v. Sessions
as 17-1310
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ANTONIO ROSA PENA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General
Elias De La Rosa Pena v. Charles Daniels, Warden
as 16-40265
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELIAS DE LA ROSA PENA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden and LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
De La Rosa Pena v. Lynch
as 1:2016cv00027
Petitioner:
Elias De La Rosa Pena
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosa Pena v. Holder, Jr.
as 14-1427
Petitioner:
DOMINGO ANTONIO ROSA PENA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Pena v. Daniels
as 1:2013cv00708
Petitioner:
Elias De La Rosa Pena
Respondent:
Charles A Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
