Cases 11 - 20 of 427
Dykes v. USA
as 2:2023cv81539
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Dykes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Haldex Brake Products Corporation v. Hsu et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Haldex Brake Products Corporation
Defendant:
Hui-Teh Hsu, Roy Lee Lemons and Christina Hsu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
US v. Roy Dykes
as 23-6974
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY LEE DYKES
Anderson v. State Of Ohio
as 2:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Anderson, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Ohio and Warden Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HIGDON JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06813
Plaintiff:
ROY LEE HIGDON JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Middleton v. The Hollywood Reporter LLC, et al
as 23-12979
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN P. MIDDLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER LLC, GARY BAUM and ROY LEE
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
US v. Roy Dykes
as 23-6848
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY LEE DYKES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19960
Plaintiff:
ROY LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roy Lee Walker v. People of The State of California
as 5:2023cv01400
Petitioner:
Roy Lee Walker
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
