Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10015
Plaintiff:
ROY SHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05328
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROY SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03945
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ROY SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Jackson
as 2:2019cv11734
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan and Shane Jackson
Petitioner:
Eugene Roy Shaw
HACKER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01385
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BARRETT, ROBERT ROBERTSON, JAMES NORMAN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hacker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00987
Plaintiff:
Eugene Barrett, Robert Robertson, James Norman and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rawlings et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Stanford, Daniel Walker, Sandra Rivero and others
Defendant:
VM Motori SpA, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Shaw, Jr. v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09754
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
