Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Fordham v. Padilla
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Fordham
Defendant:
Ruben Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo, v. Hickenlooper, et al.,
as 1:2012cv02034
Plaintiff:
Alfonso A. Carrillo, Augustin Telles, Raymundo Castillo and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper, John W. Sutters, Elizabeth Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PADILLA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51526
Plaintiff:
RUBEN PADILLA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PADILLA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76767
Plaintiff:
RUBEN PADILLA
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PADILLA v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33499
Plaintiff:
RUBEN PADILLA
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ruben Padilla-Aguirre, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73652
Petitioner:
RUBEN PADILLA-AGUIRRE and MARIA LUISA BARAJAS-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Clara Fernandez et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv05651
Plaintiff:
Clara Fernandez, Manuel Joe Padilla, Dolly Scaavedra and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Type:
Other Statutes
Ruben Padilla-Aguirre, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70722
Petitioner:
RUBEN PADILLA-AGUIRRE and MARIA LUISA BARAJAS-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Leal et al v. Woodley & McGillivary et al
as 4:2008cv03452
Plaintiff:
Irene Leal, Irene Leal, Rafael Angulo and others
Defendant:
Woodley & McGillivary and Gregory K McGillivary
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stone v. Albert, et al
as 08-2222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAFAYETTE STONE
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON ALBERT, CHRIS SANCHEZ, MDC Corrections Officer, FLOYD GONZALES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
