Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Israel v. Carter, et al.
as 24-1974
Plaintiff:
AKIVA AVIKAIDA ISRAEL
Defendant:
RUBY CARTER, SHAWNTEL SNOW, DAWN SANTOS and others
(PC) Luckett v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Keith Luckett
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Easman, Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARROYO et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01244
Plaintiff:
THERESA M. CALDWELL, JAVIER ARROYO, BERTHA ARROYO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
(PC) Miller v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01981
Plaintiff:
Michael Neal Miller
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Amy Nelson and Antonina Filenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Israel v. Carter et al
as 2:2021cv01267
Plaintiff:
Akiva A. Israel
Defendant:
Ruby Carter, Shawntel Snow, Traci Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abiuso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv12374
Plaintiff:
Dirk Delph, Erickson Christmas, Tyrone Anthony and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Reis et al
as 5:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ginny L. Reis, Jed M. Smith, Ruby Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
McKinley v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Chester Clyde McKinley
Defendant:
Ruby Carter , Kenneth L. Jones and Leon White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter et al v. Pennington et al
as 5:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Leo W. Carter and Ruby Carter
Defendant:
Douglas R. Pennington and Sharp Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
