Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Barrow v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01260
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis Barrow
Defendant:
Russell Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brit UW Limited v. Hudak et al
as 1:2014cv08503
Plaintiff:
Brit UW Limited
Defendant:
Matthew Hudak, Terrance O'Brien, Village Of Schaumburg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reed v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
Terry Reed
Defendant:
Russell Thomas, Olivia Pearson and County Board of Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Owens et al(MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Jeffery Owens, Russell Thomas, William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. Cope et al (MAG+)
as 2:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Booker T. Maddox
Defendant:
William Cope, Jeffery Owens, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00678
Petitioner:
Russell Thomas Blake
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Roseboro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Roseboro
Defendant:
Russell Thomas and Olivia Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pelton v. Barns et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Quanterio Pelton
Defendant:
Lee Barns and Russel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Mayor of Pike County et al (INAMTE2)
as 2:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Joe Lester Pennington
Defendant:
Mayor of Pike County, Pike County Commissioners, Russell Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
