Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Russell Brown
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Browning v. Ball et al
as 7:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Jon Does, Ms. Bledsoe, Deborah Lynn Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Marlon Adams
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Irene Mitchell, Captain Ervins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 3:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Russell Brown
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison, Prime Care Medical Inc. and John Doe C.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA
as 1:2016cv00273
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Russell Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carson v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Kurt Carson
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Leonard Edwards, Matthew Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plain v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2016cv00540
Plaintiff:
Bobby Plain
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Leonard Edwards, Matthew Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell Browning v. Bob McDonnell
as 14-6746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL BROWNING
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB MCDONNELL, Governor of Virginia, HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and LESLIE FLEMING, Warden of KMCC
Plain et al v. St. Louis City Division of Corrections City Justice Center et al
as 4:2013cv00755
Plaintiff:
Bobby Plain and Kurt Carson
Defendant:
St. Louis City Division of Corrections City Justice Center, Medium Security Institution, Francis Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
