Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Rueda v. Salem Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01914
Plaintiff:
Ivan Cortes Rueda
Defendant:
Salem Hospital, Andrew J. Cleary, Corby W. Makin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tropical Breeze Casino Cruz, LLC v. Markel American Insurance Company
as 8:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Tropical Breeze Casino Cruz, LLC
Defendant:
Markel American Insurance Company and Ryan S. Mentier
Not Classified By Court:
James R. Betts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
S. et al v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
RYAN S., GEORGE S. and CHRISTINE S.
Defendant:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Post et al
as 8:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Jesse Wilson
Respondent:
Ryan S. Post and Mike Hilgers
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanche Dixon, et al v. Joseph Abruzzo, et al
as 23-12277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLANCHE L. DIXON and ROY J. DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CROSSCOUNTRY MORTGAGE, LLC, CLEAR2CLOSE TITLE & ESCROW, LLC and others
PARKEY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv22192
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY PARKEY and NATHAN TIERNEY
Defendant:
RYAN S CARTER and LIVE ACTION SPORTFISHING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
HYATT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11910
Plaintiff:
RYAN S HYATT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrew Hango v. ICE, et al
as 23-55384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW S. HANGO
Defendant / Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WARDEN, Seneca County Jail, DOES, Ohio Unknown Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
