Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BRAZWELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06945
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BRAZWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephen Michel v. Cheri Brazwell, et al
as 23-35053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN BRENT MICHEL
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERI BRAZWELL and SCOTT BRAZWELL
Michel v. Brazwell et al
as 3:2022cv05286
Plaintiff:
Stephen Brent Michel
Defendant:
Cheri Brazwell and Scott Brazwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
SCOTT v. FRAME
as 3:2020cv05968
Plaintiff:
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR and STACY CHANEL
Defendant:
W TURNER, D DICE, P TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Tolliver et al
as 1:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Cleo Tolliver, Joseph Risher and Sgt. Brazwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. IRON RESTAURANT GROUP LLC et al.
as 3:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HARPER
Defendant:
IRON RESTAURANT GROUP LLC and MIKE BRAZWELL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAZWELL v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv79893
Plaintiff:
MYRON M. BRAZWELL
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
