Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lamas v. Xue et al
as 1:2026cv05472
Plaintiff:
Erich S Lamas
Defendant:
Elise Xue, Daniel Vermont, Takunda Jora and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Tista-Sis v. Blanche
as 26-60468
Petitioner:
Flory Elizabeth Tista-Sis
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Ebrahem v. Belgarde Property Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv02846
Plaintiff:
Gadistu Ebrahem
Defendant:
Belgarde Property Services, Inc., RCA, LLC, Flory Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jan v. United States of America Government et al
as 2:2026cv00304
Defendant:
Lara Lea Trump, Alejandro Padilla, Cyrus Djan and others
Plaintiff:
Sanaz Derakhshani Jan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sanaz Derakhshani Jan v. United States of America et al
as 8:2026cv00903
Plaintiff:
Sanaz Derakhshani Jan
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald John Trump, James David Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis, et al. v. Walker, et al.
as 26-1983
Plaintiff:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, RONNIE TOLLIVER and JENNIFER BROWN
Defendant:
S FLORY, DA ROSA, A. NANGALAMA and others
Winkler v. Taitz et al
as 2:2026cv01003
Plaintiff:
Geoff Winkler
Defendant:
Saidabror Khodjaev, Flory Abittan, Cal D Henrie, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Horwitz v. City of Denton et al
as 4:2026cv00220
Defendant:
City of Denton, County of Denton, Sara Hensley and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Ellery Horwitz, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
