Cases 31 - 40 of 327
Bohus v. Joshi et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
Geza Bohus
Defendant:
Vyomesh I. Joshi, Todd A. Booth, Jeffrey A. Graves and others
Moore et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 1:2022cv03045
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Moore and Collette L S Moore
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jesse Simpson v. A. McCabe
as 22-6282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MCCABE, DAP-C Chief of Psychology, C. GOMEZ, Warden, WOLEVER, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA TO BRENDAN FISCHER et al v. SENATE MAJORITY PAC
as 1:2022mc00026
In Re:
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA TO BRENDAN FISCHER
Plaintiff:
ROY S. MOORE
Defendant:
SENATE MAJORITY PAC
3Rd Party Defendant:
BRENDAN FISCHER
MARGOLIS et al v. CECIL
as 1:2022mc00022
3Rd Party Defendant:
JAMES MARGOLIS
Plaintiff:
ROY S. MOORE
Defendant:
GUY CECIL
Moore v. Senate Majority PAC et al
as 2:2022mc03966
Plaintiff:
Roy S. Moore
Defendant:
Senate Majority PAC and Waterfront Strategies
Petitioner:
Adam Muhlendorf
Theodore Medley v. S. Pfitzer, et al
as 22-15218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEODORE BEECH MEDLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
S. PFITZER, Hospital Administrator at CHCF Stockton, individual: and official capacity, YASHODARA RAO, MBBSMHA, PsyD at CHCF Stockton, individual; and official capacity, S. AREF, C.E.O. M.D. Chief Executive Officer at CHCF Stockton, individual; and official capacity and others
(PC) Theodora Medley v. S. Pfitzer et al
as 2:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Theodore Medley
Defendant:
S. Pfitzer, Yashadora Rao, S. Aref and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel Magana v. S. Moore
as 2:2022cv00631
Petitioner:
Israel Magana
Respondent:
S. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
