Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Raquel Haro v. Porter County, Indiana, et al
as 23-3091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAQUEL HARO
Defendant / Appellee:
PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA, a municipal entity, DARROLYN S. BRADLEY, individually and in her official capacity as a Porter County Jail Correctional Officer and PORTER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a municipal entity
Frandsen v. University of Alaska Fairbanks et al
as 4:2020cv00016
Defendant:
S. Bradley Moran and University of Alaska Fairbanks
Plaintiff:
Michele Frandsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bradley v. Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Karon S. Bradley
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff's Department , Pontotoc County, Mississippi and Brad Owen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Templar v. Moody et al
as 2:2010cv01756
Plaintiff:
L S Templar
Defendant:
Lauri Ann Moody, Shannon S Bradley and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L. Templar v. Dean Fink, et al
as 10-16375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L. S. TEMPLAR
Defendant - Appellee:
DEAN FINK, SHANNON S. BRADLEY and LAURI ANN MOODY
Templar v. Fink et al
as 2:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
L S Templar
Defendant:
Dean Fink , Lauri Ann Moody and Shannon S Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
