Cases 11 - 20 of 312
Miles v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv03569
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
David W Mitchell, S Brown, C Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
David W Mitchell, S Brown, C Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv03567
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
David W Mitchell, S Brown, J Saddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00914
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Brown and Christopher Brown
Respondent:
Warden Mark R. Sevier and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross (PS) v. Arapahoe Detention Facility
as 1:2023cv01793
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ross
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Arapahoe Detention Facility and Tyler S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Brown
Defendant:
Col. Evans, Dr. Peter Baddick, PA Nichole Boguslaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Schindlbeck v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Schindlbeck
Defendant:
Tyler S. Brown and Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Fitzgerald et al
as 3:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
S. Brown
Defendant:
B. Fitzgerald, Sexton and A. Quieros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardee v. Walz et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
John T. Hardee
Defendant:
Christopher Walz, John Doe Villanueva, Eric Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Ms. S. Brown, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
