Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Cherry v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Karlton Ray Cherry
Petitioner:
Karlton Cherry
Defendant:
S. Brown, J. McCalloum and S. Senko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wells v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00307
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
Ray S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cherry v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Karlton Cherry and Karlton Ray Cherry
Defendant:
S. Brown, J. McCalloum and S. Senko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waters v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Waters and Karlton Cherry
Defendant:
Warden, S. Brown, J. McCalloum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hensley v. Brown
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Robert Nathan Hensley
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hammons v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00244
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
S. Lovett and S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Prigmore v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown, FCI Hazelton Staff, Multiple Unknown Agents of FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prigmore v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Warden S. Brown, FCI Hazelton Staff, Multiple Unknown Agents of FBOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Klous v. Brown
as 3:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Jessey Klous
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
