Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Johnson et al v. Tucek et al
as 2:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Shanterrica Johnson and Shanquil Lashay Bey
Defendant:
David Tucek, Jr, Brad T Caddock, Corey P Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARLSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv20982
Plaintiff:
ANDREW S CARLSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nilsen et al v. Master Floors of Minnesota, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Pat Nilsen, John Nesse, Dominic Andrist and others
Defendant:
Master Floors of Minnesota, Inc., Daniel S. Carlson d/b/a Master Floors LLC, Genesis Flooring Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jose Nieto Avalos v. Officer S. Carlson et al
as 2:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
Jose Nieto Avalos
Defendant:
Officer S. Carlson, Officer A. Rodriguez and Officer V. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35746
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
CARLSON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv01246
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. CARLSON and ERIC S CARLSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damon Williams v. PRK Funding Services, Inc., et al
as 19-35120
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, RICHARD BESELIN, RONALD CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS
Carlson v. 3M Company
as 6:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Carlson
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v PRK Funding Services Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Williams
Defendant:
PRK Funding Services Inc, King County, Jeffrey Pyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
