Cases 1 - 10 of 17
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7238
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, J. GILLIAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7842
Defendant / Appellee:
OFC. PERRIGAN, J. ELY, Unit Manager, B. RAVIZEE MONAHAN, QMHP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Bentley
as 19-6917
Defendant / Appellee:
FL. OFFICER LEWIS, HENRY PONTON, SERGEANT MEADE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Jeffrey Kiser
as 19-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
FISCAL TECH, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
