Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Joshua Ferrell v. Jossette Okereke
as 24-3231
Petitioner:
JOSHUA S. FERRELL
Respondent:
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
Joshua Ferrell v. Jossette Okereke
as 24-3101
Petitioner:
JOSHUA S. FERRELL
Respondent:
JOSSETTE OKEREKE, Warden
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. George M. Ferrell et al
as 2:2023cv10312
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee and United African Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
GEORGE M. FERRELL, TRUSTEE, PEGGY S. FERRELL, TRUSTEE, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ferrell v. Warden
as 2:2022cv02505
Petitioner:
Joshua S. Ferrell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 1:2019cv00132
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE ROBINSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES D RENGERING, RABINDRANAUTH NARAYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaglin v. McCall et al
as 0:2018cv03079
Defendant:
Ms. Charlene Toliver, Burrows, Dr. Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Tyrell Eaglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmer v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2017cv22581
Plaintiff:
Wesley D. Simmer
Defendant:
Y. Stoker, Liu Mengmin, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 5:2017cv00051
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Ferrell v. Bank of America, N. A.
as 4:2012cv01110
Plaintiff:
Laura S Ferrell
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrell v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2010cv03515
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Ferrell
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Georgia Department of Corrections, Phillips State Prison Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
