Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters, Warden David LeMaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
William H Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Gregory Patton, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Peters et al.
as 3:2023cv02211
Plaintiff:
William H. Cook, III
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden David Lemaster, S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thomas Williams v. First Network LLC et al
as 8:2023mc00007
Plaintiff:
Thomas Williams
Defendant:
First Network LLC, Elite Integrity LLC, Ambitious Marketing Group and others
Winfree v. Gibson et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Winfree, III
Defendant:
Eric S. Gibson and E. S. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rollins v. Lane et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Lane, Department of C, Quetin Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Kurtis S. Gibson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Winfree v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Winfree, III
Defendant:
David W. Hill, Eric S. Gibson, E.S. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Bell
as 21-1892
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael S. Gibson
Respondent / Appellee:
Earl Bell, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
GIBSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24443
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID S GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
