Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Dunmore v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bruce Dunmore
Defendant:
Clerk Brenda S. Hamilton, Deputy Clerk of Roanoke Circuit Court, Deputy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Ladronal Hamilton
as 23-2851
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ladronal S. Hamilton, also known as Black
Thomas Wade Robinson v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade Robinson
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Dr. Mudge, Catherine Leigh Quill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. McCracken Co. Jail
as 5:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
James S. Hamilton
Defendant:
McCracken Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Ladronal Hamilton
as 22-1937
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ladronal S. Hamilton, also known as Black
Schuh et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Schuh and Adam S. Hamilton
Defendant:
Governor Doug Burgum, Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John S. Hamilton v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
as 2:2021mc01022
Petitioner:
Mr. John S Hamilton and Blazer Realty Investments L.P.
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Ladronal Hamilton v. United States
as 21-2635
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ladronal S. Hamilton, also known as Black
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Hamilton v. USA
as 4:2020cv00946
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ladronal S Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arthur Lowe v. Britney Hamilton, et al
as 20-20411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur David Lowe
Defendant / Appellee:
Britney S Hamilton, LL II, Pamela Taylor, B-Side Property Officer and Jennifer Coalston, Mailroom Supervisor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
