Cases 1 - 10 of 29
JAMES v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2022cv06081
Petitioner:
SAMUEL S. JAMES
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. LNU
as 1:2019cv00673
Respondent:
Rosa LNU
Petitioner:
Kodey S James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 18-10877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EUGENE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, TDCJ-CID, UNKNOWN, Custodian of Offender Records, VICKIE BARROWS, Director of Access to Courts and others
Joe v. Richardson et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
Warden Kendall T Richardson, Jennifer S Brown, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. USA
as 1:2018cv00091
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael S. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lynn v. Expansion Cell Block et al
as 7:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sean Carey Lynn
Defendant:
Expansion Cell Block, Larry D Goatley, Jr., David E Petges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James, Donald v. Wise, Joshua
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Donald S. James
Defendant:
Joshua Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Linthicum et al
as 7:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Darrold L Alexander and Marcus S Rhodes
Defendant:
Phyllis McWhorter, Tommy L. Norwood, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Murray et al
as 7:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Moses, Sr
Defendant:
Leonard S Murray, Lisa S James, Robert B Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tony Romano
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews, South Florida Reception Center (S.F.R.C.) Warden John Doe (1), Intake Officer John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
