Cases 1 - 10 of 743
Huglon v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
S L Huglon
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Watson, Jr., et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 24-11310
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATSON, JR., SHEILA WILEMON WATSON, SHANE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 3:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Tim Saxon, Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2024at00460
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Sheriff Tim Saxon, Corporal Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez et al v. AE Distribution LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lopez and S L
Defendant:
AE Distribution LLC and Alden Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
S.L. et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
S. L., V. L. and Carolyn Campbell
Defendant:
County of Riverside, DOES 1-10, inclusive. and Does 11-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L. v. Snap, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
Snap, Inc., ByteDance, Ltd., ByteDance, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al v. Weatherford U S L P
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Halliburton Energy Services Inc, Halliburton Technology Partners LLC and Halliburton Technology Partners L L C
Defendant:
Weatherford U S L P
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
