Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wilson v. Sherman, et al.
as 26-5371
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant:
STUART SHERMAN, AMBER WILLIAMS, JAN LINES and others
(PC) McElroy v. Delgado et al
as 1:2026cv05495
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Defendant:
A. Delgado, J. Moeckly, L. Pennisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McElroy v. Delgado et al
as 2:2026cv02604
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy, Lathwahn McElroy, Jabbari McElroy and others
Defendant:
A. Delgado, J. Moeckly, L. Pennisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sherman, et al.
as 26-4372
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILSON
Defendant:
STUART SHERMAN, X-Warden SATF, AMBER WILLIAMS, Captain B-Facility, JAN LINES, Plant Operations Chief Engineer and others
Scotto et al v. New York Attorney General et al
as 1:2026cv01148
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto and Carmela A. Sciabarra
Defendant:
New York Attorney General, Med Properties, Oasis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv30080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
ABRAHAMSON v. Holyoke Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv30074
Plaintiff:
DONALD ABRAHAMSON
Defendant:
Holyoke Police Department, Officer JONATHAN ORTIZ and Officer BRENDAN LEAHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leahy v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00825
Plaintiff:
Michael Leahy
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hughes et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 5:2026cv03497
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes, Adam Murray, Amanda Macon and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
