Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Walker v. Stevens et al
as 1:2010cv01073
Plaintiff:
Harold Walker
Defendant:
M. Stevens, S. Smith, S. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Clark
as 1:2010cv01000
Petitioner:
Raul S. Sanchez
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v. Sanchez Mexican Candy, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00339
Plaintiff:
Abram Gomez
Defendant:
Jerry S. Sanchez and Sanchez Mexican Candy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Terry Sanchez v. Life Insurance Company
as 09-51010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY S. SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
May v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Judith C May
Defendant:
City of Seattle, S Sanchez, R Woolery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karluk Mayweathers v. J. Woodford, et al
as 08-56835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLUK MAYWEATHERS, AKA Karluk Khan Mayweathers
Defendant - Appellee:
J S WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, N GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals, S RYAN, Acting Warden and others
Sanchez v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 5:2008cv00527
Plaintiff:
Terry S. Sanchez
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SANCHEZ v. ASTRUE
as 3:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
BRANDY S. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pete Sanchez v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 07-10812
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETE S SANCHEZ, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gonzalez et al v. Marks et al
as 1:2007cv00949
Plaintiff:
David Gonzalez, Erin Ormonde and Stevan Rosenlind
Defendant:
G Marks, Bonilla, S. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
