Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04767
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cesar-Solis v. Blanche
as 26-4659
Petitioner:
EDGAR CESAR-SOLIS
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estate of Mario Solis, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 26-4642
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF MARIO SOLIS, by and through successor in interest, Sara Solis and SARA SOLIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity, SHIRLEY BAUTISTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04643
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv12488
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Magno v. Behavioral Health (Chi-Bright)
as 2:2026cv05052
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline R Solis Magno and Jacqueline Solis
Defendant:
Behavioral Health (Chi-Bright)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez-Solis v. United States District Court District of New Mexico
as 2:2026cv02343
Petitioner:
Alfredo Juan Martinez-Solis
Defendant:
United States District Court District of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08878
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
